About Londonist

You are reading Londonist: a website about London. More

Editor: Hazel Tsoi, Lindsey Clarke
Publisher: Gothamist

About | Archive | Contact | Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Staff

Categories
Favourites
Contribute

Latest tip:

Hi there - quick comment on your otherwise excellent Totteridge yew article. The seeds of Yew tre [more]

Latest link:

Latest Photo:

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Londonist.
Competitions
Win tickets to Bring Stuff party, 1 Nov
Fantasy Football
Follow the fortunes of Londonist United
Top Tags
Search our content using these popular tags:
Regulars
Shortlisted for Best European Blog 2008
Londonist07.jpg
The Way We See It
This week's location:

deansyard.jpg

Got a London Question?
kudocitieslogo.jpg
Stuff we like

May 12, 2006

Essex Road Is Full Of Semi-Criminals

poverty and wealth.jpg
Or at least it used to be, according to Charles Booth’s famous poverty maps from the end of the Victorian era.

His maps show the haves and have-nots in glorious Technicolor; yellow for ‘Upper-middle and Upper classes. Wealthy’; black for ‘Lowest class. Vicious, semi-criminal’.

The Charles Booth Online Archive have recently made the maps available online. Helpfully, the site displays a modern map alongside the Booth original, so it’s easy to see which bit of town you’ve zoomed in on.

One of the most striking observations is that pockets of poverty often nestle up to streets of great wealth; a quirk of London that still exists today. And the east-west divide is very clear.

Does anyone know if a modern version of the map exists? We're curious as to how they'd colour the Archer household in Vauxhall - yellow or black both seem apt.

Email This Entry







Advertisement: Londonist Continues Below!

Comments (2) [rss]

Oddly enough, the Economist ran a story last week about using the 2001 census data to compare modern London with Charles Booth's map. However, there's only a few small sections of the city on their site, and indeed it seems they've only analysed a bit of Chelsea.

The conclusion does seem to be that if a bit of London was poor in the 1880s it probably still is, though.

 

the economist did an article this week about the old maps and a modern version, but i'm not sure where you can find the ones. if someone has access to this week's economist....

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2008 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We use MovableType.

Site Meter